-------------------------
 
Via Workers World News Service
 
Reprinted from the Aug. 29, 2002
 
issue of Workers World newspaper
 
-------------------------
 
 
 
EXECUTION IN TEXAS: A SLAP IN THE FACE TO MEXICAN SOVEREIGNTY
 
 
 
By Greg Butterfield
 
 
 
In a racist slap in the face to Mexico's national
 
sovereignty, the state of Texas and the Bush administration
 
went ahead with the Aug. 14 execution of Javier Suarez
 
Medina, a former fast-food worker, over protests from
 
Mexican President Vicente Fox.
 
 
 
A Mexican citizen, Suarez was denied his consular rights
 
after his arrest in 1988 for killing an undercover cop
 
posing as a drug trafficker. He was then 19 years old.
 
 
 
Suarez was never notified of his rights under the Vienna
 
Convention of 1963 to seek representation and assistance
 
from the Mexican government. The Mexican Embassy was never
 
notified of Suarez's case through his entire trial, or after
 
his conviction and death sentence. The Mexican government
 
only learned of the case during an appeal.
 
 
 
Mexico has outlawed the death penalty and refuses to
 
extradite suspects who may face execution to the U.S.
 
Currently 17 Mexican citizens are on death row in Texas.
 
 
 
The Mexican government and people are acutely aware of the
 
racist character of the death penalty, especially as it is
 
applied in Texas, and of the lack of even the most basic
 
safeguards and standards of representation for poor
 
defendants.
 
 
 
"Whenever a Mexican citizen is facing the death penalty,
 
prompt and extensive consular support is provided to ensure
 
that the defendant has everything necessary to mount a full
 
and fair defense," said a statement from the Mexican
 
Embassy. "In case after case, timely assistance from the
 
Mexican authorities has meant the difference between life
 
and death."
 
 
 
INTERNATIONAL PROTEST
 
 
 
On Aug. 9 the United Nations Sub-Commission on Human Rights,
 
composed of 26 independent human rights experts, called on
 
Washington to intervene to stay Suarez's execution and
 
reexamine the case.
 
 
 
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson sent a
 
letter to Secretary of State Colin Powell expressing her
 
"serious concerns that the trial proceedings in the case had
 
not complied with international human rights standards."
 
 
 
Thirteen Latin American and European countries joined Mexico
 
in filing a "friend of the court" brief with the U.S.
 
Supreme Court when Suarez's attorney sought a last-minute
 
reprieve there.
 
 
 
The Mexican Senate took out full-page ads in several Texas
 
newspapers. President Fox spoke to President George W. Bush
 
and Texas Gov. Rick Perry, and wrote a letter to Perry
 
spelling out why the execution was illegal.
 
 
 
All of it was to no avail. Washington did not intervene to
 
stop the execution. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected the
 
appeal. The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles voted 17-0 to
 
go ahead with the lynching, lacking even the usual "legal"
 
pretext. And Perry refused to grant a 30-day stay to
 
reexamine the case.
 
 
 
Suarez died by lethal injection at 6:23 p.m. Aug. 14 in the
 
Huntsville, Texas, death chamber. Outside, the Texas Death
 
Penalty Abolition Movement and other death-penalty foes
 
protested.
 
 
 
Protests also took place in Mexico City, in front of the
 
U.S. Embassy, and in Zocalo Plaza. There farmers from San
 
Salvador Atenco, whose militant protests forced the Fox
 
government to drop plans to build an airport on their lands,
 
rallied against the execution and to drop criminal charges
 
against their leaders.
 
 
 
That night, Fox's spokespeople held a news conference
 
announcing that he had canceled a scheduled four-city tour
 
of Texas, including a visit to Bush's ranch. "This decision
 
is an unequivocal signal of rejection of the execution," Fox
 
said in a statement. would be inappropriate, under the
 
lamentable circumstances, to go ahead with the visit to
 
Texas."
 
 
 
ORDERS CAME FROM THE TOP
 
 
 
The White House responded with a patronizing statement about
 
Bush's and Fox's "excellent professional relationship and
 
strong friendship."
 
 
 
Bush's refusal to intervene should not be taken to mean he
 
had a hands-off policy toward the Suarez execution. In fact,
 
it is impossible to believe that Bush was not involved in
 
the decision to go ahead with the lynching when high-level
 
international relations were at stake. The decision to kill
 
Suarez came from the top.
 
 
 
As governor of Texas, Bush directly oversaw the illegal
 
execution of another Mexican citizen, Miguel Flores, in
 
November 2000, while the results of the presidential
 
election were in disarray. Flores had also been denied his
 
consular rights. The Clinton administration stood by quietly
 
and did nothing.
 
 
 
In 1999, Bush had overseen the illegal execution of a
 
Canadian, Stanley Faulder. His arrogant answer at that time
 
was that "the state of Texas never signed the Vienna
 
Convention," as if the state was not bound by the treaties
 
signed by the U.S. government. That argument was echoed by
 
prosecutors in the Suarez case.
 
 
 
In all, Bush oversaw 152 executions--more than any other
 
governor in the country. Most of those killed were Black and
 
Latino. All were poor and working-class people.
 
 
 
For public consumption, Bush and Fox--a pro-U.S. former Coca-
 
Cola executive--have tried to portray themselves as buddies
 
and equals who have each other's ear on matters ranging from
 
trade to immigration policy.
 
 
 
But the Suarez execution shines a spotlight on the true neo-
 
colonial character of the relationship. Bush, as head of the
 
powerful imperialist empire, has no respect for Mexico's
 
sovereignty or the pleas of his "good friend" Fox.
 
 
 
- END -
 
 
 
(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
 
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
 
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
 
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
 
 
Unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Support the voice of
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to