-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the Dec. 5, 2002
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

Boston frame-up foiled:

ANTI-WAR, LABOR UNITY WINS VICTORY FOR MARCUS JEAN

By Steve Kirschbaum,
Boston Labor's ANSWER, member Steel Workers Local 8751

On Nov. 14, after less than 30 minutes of deliberation, a 
West Roxbury Court jury returned its verdict of "not guilty" 
in the case of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts vs. Boston 
school bus driver Marcus Jean.

This brought to a successful conclusion a critical phase in 
the struggle to win justice for Jean, an activist member of 
Steel Workers Local 8751. It was also an important victory 
in building unity between the anti-war movement and the 
movement to defend labor's rights.

In his closing remarks to the jury, people's lawyer Barry 
Wilson explained that this case represented Laidlaw Corp.'s 
cynical use of the governments' post-Sept. 11 pro-war frenzy 
to fire a union activist.

Wilson's remarks were reported in a front-page article 
headlined "Bus Driver Cleared of Terror Threat Charges" in 
the Boston Banner, the newspaper of Boston's African 
American community.

Laidlaw, which is in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, had targeted 
Jean as part of its policy to weed out unionists who resist 
the firm's plans to downsize, cut wages and tighten its grip 
on the work force.

On Jan. 30, Jean was involved in a minor disagreement with 
another driver concerning a bus parking spot. Jean and his 
union steward met with Readville Assistant Manager Diane 
Kelly and resolved the matter. No warning or discipline of 
any kind was issued.

The next morning Readville Terminal Manger Rick McLaughlin, 
in a provocative and threatening manner, tried to 
interrogate Jean about this same incident. Jean recognized 
that this was a gross violation of his union rights. He 
called McLaughlin on his racist discrimination and refused 
to submit to management harassment.

The dispute came in the context of dozens of union cases 
against McLaughlin for harassment, intimidation and threats 
against union drivers. That afternoon McLaughlin went to the 
police. He claimed that Jean had repeatedly threatened to 
blow up the building and posed a serious "terrorist" threat.

The Boston Police Report cites Laidlaw Corp. as the 
"victim." McLaughlin subsequently used this false charge to 
fire Jean.

LAIDLAW, GOV'T CONSPIRE IN 
'HOMELAND SECURITY' FRAME-UP

Government attacks on the labor movement are nothing new. 
The Teamsters, AFSCME, Service Employees and Steel Workers 
are just a few of the recent targets. Injunctions during 
strikes, false charges under the RICO statutes, and 
fraudulent prosecution by the Labor Department have become 
routine.

Bush's "enduring war" has upped the ante in the attacks on 
labor. The Bush/ Ashcroft "Homeland Security" machine 
clearly has the unions in its sights. The White House has 
given the green light to Corporate America to use the 
"enduring war" to declare war on union rights.

In a recent West Coast labor conflict, Homeland Security 
boss Tom Ridge used a "national security" cover to threaten 
the president of the International Longshore and Warehouse 
Union dock workers in California. Bush invoked the notorious 
anti-union Taft-Hartly Act against the longshore union.

The March 2002 issue of Local 8751's rank-and-file 
newsletter the Unity Bulletin explained that Marcus Jean's 
case was part of "a national wave of government-directed 
anti-immigrant hysteria sweeping the country." This wave 
includes racist profiling, government detention of Arab 
people without charges and racist violence against immigrant 
communities.

It is in this context that the district attorney for 
Massachusetts embarked on a 10-month prosecution of an 
innocent Haitian-born union activist based on the 
uncorroborated story of a racist Laidlaw boss.

BOSTON LABOR'S ANSWER
LEADS STRUGGLE

Much of the union leadership on the local and national level 
has been unable to respond to the corporate/government 
attacks on the unions in the current war climate. This was 
the case with Marcus Jean. The rank-and-file members, 
however, showed they are ready to fight back.

Boston Labor's ANSWER, made up of activists from the 
coalition Act Now to Stop War and End Racism, established 
the Marcus Jean Defense Committee. The committee secured the 
top criminal attorney in the region, people's lawyer Barry 
Wilson, knowing that he would bring the struggle of the 
street into the courtroom.

ANSWER activists launched a full-scale, al-out defense 
campaign to mobilize support. This included packing every 
court appearance, getting endorsers, holding picket lines 
and news conferences, speaking at churches and community 
meetings, and spreading the word through the Internet. The 
committee also conducted a massive letter campaign to the 
district attorney demanding that the charges be dropped.

Marcus Jean spoke at and marched in many ANSWER protests 
against war on Iraq and in defense of Palestine. He was a 
featured speaker at the June 29 rally against the Patriot 
Act, at FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C.

This campaign to defend Marcus Jean was a concrete 
expression of ANSWER's view that Bush's war has a domestic 
front. Fighting on this front can help build unity with the 
labor movement, which is vital to the anti-war movement.

The Marcus Jean Defense Committee will continue the struggle 
to demand that Laidlaw reinstate him to his job with full 
back pay and benefits. n

- END -

(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to 
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but 
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact 
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support the voice of 
resistance http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)


 

------------------
This message is sent to you by Workers World News Service.
To subscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to