-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the Feb. 6, 2003
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

AROUND THE WORLD:PROTESTS CONTINUE AGAINST THE WAR

By John Catalinotto

After the massive demonstrations on Jan. 18, and with preparations
already underway for the next coordinated day of international actions on
Feb. 15, anti-war forces worldwide have kept up a continuous wave of
local
protests against the looming U.S. attack on Iraq.

On Jan. 27, the day Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei were presenting
the
inspectors' report to the United Nations Security Council, tens of
thousands of people were hitting the streets in Middle Eastern capital
cities to protest the planned aggression.

The largest actions were outside UN offices in Syria, Yemen and
Bahrain.
There was also a rally in Morocco. An additional thousand people
demonstrated in the streets of Bombay, India, where they blocked traffic
in the financial capital of the Asian subcontinent.

Thousands of demonstrators in Damascus called Bush a "criminal and a
butcher" and demanded he dump his plans to attack Iraq. "We sacrifice
our
souls and blood for Iraq," chanted young people in the Damascus streets.
Most of the protesters believed the U.S. planned to weaken the Arab
world
and destroy Iraq "to control its oil," a student there told the media.

In the Yemeni capital, Sana'a, both government and opposition parties
took
the leadership of the demonstration. Tens of thousands of Yemenis
marched
from a main square to the UN office to deliver a message demanding the
UN
prevent the war.

"No to an attack on Iraq. No to American arrogance," one banner read.
There, too, a major point of the talks was that the U.S. was after Iraq's
oil.

In the Bahraini capital of Manama, some hundreds of young
demonstrators
also demanded that the UN prevent the United States from launching a
war
on Iraq. Wielding banners saying "No to war in Iraq" and "Death to
America," they delivered a letter asking the United Nations to fight
poverty and illiteracy rather than provide authorization for a war on
Iraq.

"If the United Nations doesn't have the power [to stop the war], then
there is no reason for it to exist," one of the youth told the media.

In Baghdad, Iraq itself, close to 10,000 demonstrators marched past UN
offices protesting U.S. plans to invade. They pledged to defend their
country and burned a U.S. flag.

WORLD SOCIAL FORUM HITS U.S. ON IRAQ

Just as the European Social Forum in Florence, Italy, last November
became a magnet for those protesting Wash ington's plans to invade and
occupy Iraq, so did the World Social Forum meeting in Porto Alegre,
Brazil.

With the forum's location in South America, it was natural that the
100,000 participants would focus on vital regional issues like
Washington's plans to dominate the hemisphere's economy through the
Free
Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). But many contingents in a march to
open
the forum's activities on Jan. 23 and in a later demonstration on Jan. 27
to protest the FTAA also raised solidarity with Iraq against U.S.
aggression.

The Pentagon already has a large number of "advisers" in Colombia to
help
the oligarchy there fight the successful guerrilla movements of the
FARC-EP and the ELN. Washington has openly supported opponents of
the
elected government of Hugo Ch�vez in Venezuela. Those in the southern
Brazilian city to attend the forum had ample reason to be concerned
about
stopping U.S. militarism on all continents.

Protests spread also to cities in the U.S. Some 3,000 people marched in
Denver and another 5,000 to 10,000 in Pittsburgh on Jan. 25 against the
planned war.

Even a small protest can be significant. In Gainesville, Fla., on Jan. 17,
three people set up a protest action in a busy crossroads. In a region
where anti-militarist protest is rare, three people felt they had enough
passive support to go public with their political position against the
war.

The large national demonstrations have changed the political climate and
encouraged the widespread feelings against this war to come out into the
open.

MILITARY TARGETS

The struggle continued on other continents, too. In Germany on Jan. 25
the
movement reached a high point for this year in the North-Rhine
Westphalia
state. Some 400 demonstrators blocked access to a NATO base in
Geilenkirchen for an hour. In Bochum the Peace Plenum held a protest.
Also, some 5,000 people marched in Aachen near the Belgian border
and some
10,000 marched through the inner city of Cologne, which had been
severely
damaged by bombing in World War II.

The demonstrators in Geilenkirchen called upon the German troops to
refuse participation in a war against Iraq. There were smaller
demonstrations in other cities.

Also in Germany, the anti-globalization organization Attac-Germany is
holding a 10-day whirlwind tour of 14 universities with speakers from the
anti-war movements of Italy, Britain and the United States. Law student
Julie Fry, who helped organize student outreach for the ANSWER
coalition's
Oct. 26 and Jan. 18 demonstrations in Washington, D.C., is representing
the U.S. movement. The meetings have attracted from 100 to 500 people
at
each stop, where dozens of bus tickets for the upcoming Feb. 15 action
in
Berlin are sold each night.

British demonstrators are also focusing on military bases. They hit
Northwood UK Armed Forces Command Center on Jan. 18, and aimed at
Fairford on Jan. 26. At Fairford, it is expected that U.S. B-2 bombers
will take off to carpet bomb Iraq. The protesters plan actions to disrupt
the military machine.

In Japan, too, one focus has been the U.S. military, both on land and sea.
The U.S. aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk landed at Yokosuka, Japan, where it
was to leave for the Gulf and the war theater. After countrywide protests
on Jan. 18 and 19, people demonstrated again in Yokosuka on Jan. 20
as the
USS Kitty Hawk was setting sail. It left for Iou Island but then returned,
only to depart again on Jan. 23.

On both days the demonstrators appealed not only to passersby but also
to
U.S. service people. According to one report from a demonstrator, "A GI,
one of the Kitty Hawk crew, told us that 20 percent of the crew members
of
the Kitty Hawk won't go to Iraq and another 60 percent are undecided and
feel uneasy." Many U.S. sailors showed their anti-war feelings to the
demonstrators.

The experience of the Japanese movement again shows the potential of
organizing among the U.S. troops as a direct way of stopping the war.

The Japanese movement plans actions on Feb. 14 and 15 and again on
Feb.
23.

Regarding the Jan. 18 coordinated action itself, WW has received more
accurate information with more details than were available in our last
article. According to a release from the France "Not in Our Name" group,
the total number of people demonstrating throughout some 40 cities in
France that day was 200,000. They said, "No war on Iraq."

In Canada, about the same number must have been in the streets as in
France. Reports from the main student group, SASWI, put "almost
20,000 in
Toronto, 25,000 in Montreal, 20,000 in Vancouver, and lots more in about
32 other cities."

More than 1,000 people protested against U.S. plans to attack Iraq in
Reykjavik, Iceland, on Jan. 18. The entire population of Reykjavik and
surroundings is 180,000 people. There are also plans for a demonstration
in Iceland on Feb. 15.

Further reports from Germany show that 500 demonstrated in Bonn on
Jan.
18 and another 2,000 in the Bavarian city of Munich.

- END -

(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to copy and
distribute verbatim copies of this document, but changing it is not
allowed. For more information contact Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY,
NY
10011; via e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe wwnews-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support the voice of
resistance
http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)


------------------
This message is sent to you by Workers World News Service.
To subscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to