-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the March 6, 2003
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

NEW YORK: 
HOMELESSNESS REACHES LEVELS OF GREAT DEPRESSION 

By Heather Cottin

A scourge is haunting the capital of capitalism: homelessness. Not since 
the Great Depression has New York City seen such growth in the number of 
families and individuals who turn to the overcrowded municipal homeless 
shelters for refuge.

In a report titled "State of the Homeless 2003," the New York Coalition 
for the Homeless has revealed the appalling fact that homelessness has 
grown by over 200 percent since the housing crisis first reappeared 
during the Reagan era. The decision by banks and city government to 
decrease New York's affordable low-income housing stock has favored 
landlords and forced thousands into destitution since the 1980s, even as 
the economy was booming for most of this time.

The report indicates that homelessness primarily affects families with 
children. This winter children composed 50 percent of New York City's 
homeless.

Children and families made up 79 per cent of those seeking shelter last 
year--double what it was five years ago. Home less ness among 
individuals has risen as well.

One way the city deals with families facing homelessness is to purchase 
temporary housing in the form of "scattered site units." That is a 
euphemism for the practice of paying landlords $100 a night to house 
families. Landlords then turn the families out on the streets. They are 
forced right back into the fetid homeless shelters, which are unable to 
handle the growing numbers of poor and working people who can no longer 
afford to pay rent.

By supporting the landlords at $3,000 a month per apartment, the city is 
contributing to the housing crisis for the poor. Mayor Michael Bloomberg 
is effectively reducing the number of apartment units available at 
reasonable rents. Rental prices are thus artificially manipulated up 
ward, simultaneously creating more home essness and more profit for the 
mayor's landlord constituency.

The number of low-rent apartments in New York City shrank from over 1 
million to fewer than 500,000 in the 1990s.

Because of a 1981 court ruling, Callahan vs. Carey, the administration 
of Rudolph Giuliani was prevented in 2000 from evicting homeless people 
from New York City shelters. The court had ruled that individuals who 
face "physical, mental or social dysfunction" have the right to 
temporary haven in a public shelter.

Bloomberg has decided to ignore the ruling, and force homeless adults 
out of the shelters and into the streets after 30 days. Bloomberg, like 
Giuliani before him, would evict men and women, many of whom are 
veterans or mentally disabled.

Charles Dickens would find Bloom berg's scheme to break up destitute 
families incredible. The plan would place all homeless children in 
foster homes and throw their parents out into the streets.

Bloomberg, a multi-billionaire, is displaying the depravity of 
capitalism and the transparent superficiality of the bourgeois class, 
which pretends to care about "family values."

The report says there are now 40,000 homeless in New York City. That's 
an 82 percent increase over 1998. The cost of one day of war on Iraq 
could provide comfortable apartments for all of them, with plenty left 
over for other social needs.

- END -

(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to copy and 
distribute verbatim copies of this document, but changing it is not 
allowed. For more information contact Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, 
NY 10011; via e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe wwnews-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support the 
voice of resistance http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)




------------------
This message is sent to you by Workers World News Service.
To subscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to