-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the April 15, 2004
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

WOMEN'S RIGHTS & BLACK LIBERATION PART 5--
POST-CIVIL WAR & RECONSTRUCTION: DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS CREATE BREACH

By Leslie Feinberg

In the late 1860s, the Democratic and Republican parties--acting on
behalf of differing economic interests--tried to drive a deep wedge
between the struggles for Black liberation and women's suffrage.

The "hard-cop, soft-cop" roles of today's Republicans and Democrats were
reversed in that era. In "Market Elections--How Demo cracy Serves the
Rich," Vince Copeland explains that the Republican Party of the Northern
industrialists and bankers had been the organizer of the Civil War and
the leading advocate of abolishing slavery. "Its smaller radical wing in
Congress identified itself to a great extent with the Black masses,
fighting hard but unsuccessfully for the division of the plantations
into free farms for the oppressed," he writes.

"The Democratic Party, on the other hand, had been the party of
reaction, the party of the slaveholders, and even in the North was
generally their ally," Copeland concludes.

The Republicans, eager to gain ascendancy by winning Black voters,
backed a 15th amendment to the U.S. Constitution to extend suffrage to
Black men, but not to women. The Southern former slave-owners, fearing
the numerical and political strength of the Black vote, offered white
women the right to suffrage.

Black leaders like Sojourner Truth, Frances Ellen Watkins Harper and
Frederick Douglass--who had worked hard for decades to expand the rights
of all women--called on white women leaders to support the 15th
Amendment as a first step toward putting African Americans on an equal
political status with whites in a period of violent lynch-law
repression.

In this decisive moment, two currents emerged among white women
struggling for suffrage.

Several of the most prominent, well-to-do white suffragists, such as
Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton--those most recalled and
honored today on minted coins and postage stamps and March television
programming--actively opposed the 15th Amendment. They resorted to white
supremacist arguments, which can easily be found in the historic record.

Anthony actually campaigned against the 15th Amendment with Democratic
Party backing.

STANDING TALL FOR BLACK-WHITE UNITY

But many, many white women who had been steeled in the struggle against
the patriarchs of property and power to win Black liberation and women's
rights did stand tall for unity.

Abby Kelly Foster, an Irish-American leader of the early women's rights
movement, took on Stanton on the question of Black men: "Have we any
true sense of justice? Are we not dead to the sentiment of humanity if
we shall wish to postpone his security against present woes and future
enslavement till woman shall obtain political rights?"

Frances Dana Gage also took on Anthony and Stanton. The three were
considered the triumvirate of white leaders for woman's rights. "Could I
with breath defeat the 15th Amendment, I would not do it," she wrote.
"It is my earnest wish that the 15th Amendment may be ratified."

Mary Ashton Livermore refused to publish in her newspaper articles that
Stanton and Anthony wrote calling for opposition to the 15th Amendment.

After attending woman's rights conferences in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio,
Michigan, Kansas and Wis con sin, Livermore wrote in language that is
moving, but dated: "The Western women moving for woman's enfranchisement
do not oppose the 15th Amendment. We have never heard it opposed at a
Western women's meeting, in a single instance. Western women comprehend
that humanity is one-- that the colored man cannot be elevated without,
at the same time, uplifting the colored woman--and they see clearly that
through the gap in the fence made by the colored man, as he passes over
into citizenship, all American women will pass to the same destination."

Lucy Stone, who had bitterly opposed Douglass on this question earlier,
also came over to support the 15th Amendment. Stone introduced a
resolution declaring women's support for the amendment at a Woman's
Rights Convention held in Chicago in September 1869, asserting, "We
rejoice in every extension of suffrage."

When the resolution passed with only two dissenting votes she observed
that this consensus was "an accurate expression of the feeling of the
woman's suffrage advocates in regard to the 15th Amendment. Not one in a
thousand of them is opposed to it. On the contrary, they know that Negro
men, and all women, suffer a grievous, common wrong; and are glad when
either class, or individuals of either class, can escape from it. Let
the friends of both causes cheerfully give each other credit for real
facts. Each bitterly needs all the help of the other."

When the 15th Amendment was adopted into the Constitution on March 30,
1870, even amidst the cheers of victory Frederick Douglass rallied for a
campaign to win a new amendment that would extend suffrage to all women.

Douglass praised Victoria Claflin Woodhull for the support she'd given
the struggle to get the amendment passed.

In May 1872, Woodhull was nominated for president of the United States
by the Equal Rights party, a split-off of the socialist International
Work ingmen's Association. At her suggestion, Frederick Douglass was
nominated to run for vice-president on the same ticket.

Historian Philip S. Foner wrote that, "Victoria Woodhull felt that woman
suffragists in the Stanton-Anthony camp had been wrong in splitting with
Douglass, whom she admired and respected, and that the movement would be
benefited by reuniting the woman's struggle with the Negro's cause."

UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN MASTERS

But those who struggled for Black freedom and women's rights--and all
who fought for economic and social justice--came up against a formidable
new enemy alliance.

The former Southern slave-owners, desperate to unleash all-out counter-
revolution to overturn Black Reconstruction, found a class ally in the
Northern capitalists.

Once capital was free to expand westward, the monarchs of money formed a
partnership with the old kings of cotton, helping them swindle freed
slaves out of the promise of "40 acres and a mule."

In 1877 the Northern capitalist class withdrew its federal troops from
the South--the last time in this country's pre-imperialist history that
the military could have played a progressive role.

The Emancipation Proclamation, inked on Jan. 1, 1863, had mandated that
the U.S. government-and the entire military--must maintain the freedom
of former slaves, and "will do no acts to repress such persons, or any
of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom." And the
proclamation also specifically spelled out the right of African
Americans to self-defense against violence.

But the 1877 Compromise left the largely unarmed former slaves
defenseless.

The political harbinger of this treachery was the Tilden-Hayes betrayal
of 1876--a vote-switching election rigged particularly against Black
voters. It was the political handshake of the Republicans with the
Dixiecrat Southern landowners.

Copeland stresses, "Both Republican and Democratic parties were, from
then on, the exclusive parties of U.S. big business with no other
significance (besides the enrichment of professional bourgeois
politicians) than to continue the rule of big business with one or
another reformist or reactionary method."

Capitalism was rapidly reaching a new stage of development, one that
would leave its impact on all movements for social and economic
equality.

[Next: Rise of Rambo.]

- END -

(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to copy and
distribute verbatim copies of this document, but changing it is not
allowed. For more information contact Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY,
NY 10011; via e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe wwnews-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support the
voice of resistance http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)




------------------ This message is sent to you by Workers World News Service. To subscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Reply via email to