-cc www-tag (prolly editorial, not worth lots of attention), +cc www-archive (feel free to cite/forward)
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 18:02 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/metaDataInURI-31 "A correctly written browser would have shown the faulty XML as text, or might conceivably have shown a warning about the apparent mismatch between the type inferred from the URI and the returned Content-Type of the image." image? typo? And I don't see any possible mismatch. Copy-and-paste-o? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
