* Bjoern Hoehrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-17 11:52+0200] > > Hi,
Hi Bjoern, Saw this and thought of you... http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22constructive+criticism%22 cheers, Dan (www-archive lurker) > > May I assume the recent changes to http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home > and other images are accidental and their previous state will be re- > stored soon? It seems reasonable to assume that because > > * they now use the old #005A9C blue instead of the "new" #083D94 > (which would be a very bad idea, in my opinion) > > * they look most unprofessional, e.g. the tiny (R) in the image > above is just blur dust, while it was legible in the old ones > > * the addition of SVG versions implies that popular user agents > like Internet Explorer will typically render replacement images > due to lack of SVG support in <img> > > * the updates were made only to some but not all images, e.g. > http://www.w3.org/Icons/WWW/w3c_home.png remains unmodified, > just like e.g. the Valid Foo badges > > * the SVG versions are rather unprofessional and inaccessible, > they won't work on mobile devices due to extensive and un- > justified use of CSS, they encode text as paths instead of > encoding them as text, and have other problems > > * there was no announcement of such a change that I know of, > even though I would have to update offline packages of tools > and documentation if it's not an accidental change > > Thanks, > -- > Bj?rn H?hrmann ? mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ? http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de > Weinh. Str. 22 ? Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 ? http://www.bjoernsworld.de > 68309 Mannheim ? PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 ? http://www.websitedev.de/
