I just discovered this spec:
HTTP in RDF
Editors' Draft 20 March 2006
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-HTTP-in-RDF-20060320
I don't see where to send feedback. Please cite/forward as appropriate.
This is interesting stuff. I've done various bits of related work.
I note the RDF Schema in section 5 gives URIs like..
http://www.w3.org/1999/xx/http#Request
Ralph, CVS suggests you last updated that request.
It looks like that schema in section 5 would be a good update.
In this case, I doubt the editors meant what this says:
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&http-ns;allow">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Allow</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:comment>The Allow header</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="&http-ns;header"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&http-ns;Request"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&http-ns;Response"/>
</rdf:Property>
that says that everything with an allow property is both a Request
_and_ a Response. See
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-domain-and-range
Hmm... I also see
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-RFC822-in-RDF-20060216 ;
I don't care for the name/value approach there.
You might be interested in some work I've done...
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/email
and related work...
http://esw.w3.org/topic/EmailVocabulary
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
