Hi Bjoern,
Le 5 oct. 06 à 15:27, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit :
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is a QA Review comment for "XML Binding Language (XBL) 2.0"
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/
2006-06-19
Last Call WD
About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/#terminology
Your comments would be so much more readable if you could drop all
this
redundant information, indent quotes, and wrap lines at ~76
characters.
For example, instead of all of the above, I would just write:
In http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/#terminology
Point taken :) I'll modify my script:
- to remove redundant information.
- indenting quote is a bit more delicate but I can try.
Though I'm not a big fan of 76 characters lines which breaks awfully
in long threads or in the fact that do not resize if I decide to have
a small window in my mailer.
We know that this is a comment, what the title of the document is,
when
it was published, what its status was at time of publication, and what
the URL of the document is. The same goes for quotes where you go
as far
as citing the very second the document was published.
:) not me, but HTTP, but I'll do a lighter version
The quote is automagically generated by a mailto Javascript
See http://www.w3.org/2000/08/eb58
Likewise, it would
be much better if you could first state the comment and then
explain why
you are proposing the change. For example:
In http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/#terminology the
definition of the term "XBL subtree" should be replaced by
"An XBL subtree is a fragment body in an XML document..." ...
Maybe not exactly like that but I can change a bit the way it is
done. No troubles.
The rest is not for www-archive but a discussion about the comment
which MUST go on the appropriate ML.
Best.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
