Hi Björn,
Le 28 févr. 2007 à 09:19, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit :
My link should neither break nor reference outdated information (until
the Odiferous Style Sheets 1.0 Recommendation is no longer believed to
be appropriate for implementation). How can I make such a link (there
obviously is no simple answer to this)? If that is not possible, why
not?
Do you have a suggestion? or a series of suggestions? Just to have
more things to chew on.
It sounds like that Normative References on the wiki[1] is a good
place to gather our issues and thoughts. There is also the section on
how to cite Unicode [2][3] which is given in the QA Framework
Specification guidelines[4][5]
# Some Thoughts
The link will never break if the link is made to the dated version,
but might be outdated if a future version is released. The way we do
now is a double link for global references (which doesn't solve your
issue but might lead us to a best practice.)
Example:
XML10
Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third
Edition), E. Maler, J. Paoli, F. Yergeau, T. Bray, C. M.
Sperberg-McQueen, Editors, W3C Recommendation, 4 February
2004,
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204/ .
Latest version available at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/
.
What I tend to do myself is to give two references. For example, in
the QA Framework Specifications Guidelines.
Some of these classes of products have various
degrees of conformance (Appendix G: Conformance
Criteria [SVG11]), e.g., static / dynamic for
interpreters and static / dynamic for high-quality
for viewers. SVG 1.1 also defines modules that are
grouped into profiles (tiny/mobile/full).
Which gives in terms of markup
Some of these classes of products have
<a href="
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-SVG11-20030114/conform.html";>
various degrees of conformance</a> (Appendix G:
Conformance Criteria [<a href="#SVG11">SVG11</a>]),
e.g., static / dynamic for interpreters and static /
dynamic for high-quality for viewers. SVG 1.1 also
defines modules that are grouped into profiles
(tiny/mobile/full).
Not perfect but giving a start.
It raises another wider issues, which is technical dependencies
management. When I scratch here (Tokyo) with my nail (modify a
technology), does it make an earthquake in San Francisco (other
technologies which are affected.)
[1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/NormativeReferences
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-charmod-20050215/#sec-RefUnicode
[3] http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/versions/#Citations
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#ref-norm-principle
[5] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#ref-define-practice
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
