On Wed, 2 May 2007, ddailey wrote: > > Sorry for getting carried away by the spirit of it all with the > plus-one-ing ! I blame Dave Hyatt for the provocation, but will try to > behave myself in the future.
Great, thanks! > As long as we're offlist -- I would really like to know if what I > proposed, concerning issue tracking, in the W3c archive list would work > at all for you. I believe I cc-ed Dave Hyatt. I'd work with whatever issue tracking we end up with. In my opinion an issue tracking system has several key requirements: * It should automatically track e-mails on an issue so that there is always a complete log of all mail on a topic. * It should enable people to clearly summarise all arguments in one place. * It should allow for a clear statement of the current state of the issue (resolved, open, etc). But I'll let you and Dan and everyone else sort out what we actually use. I don't really have the bandwidth to figure out what the system is. So long as it does the above, it'll be fine. :-) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
