Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On May 7, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
[...]
I _only_ have use for * I support the proposal; I'm willing to help get it deployed* I object to the proposal to the extent that I want to put the whole project at risk I'm happy to lump all the rest (abstain/no answer/disagree/whatever) together, for formal decision-making purposes.It seems that these are the most extreme positions possible on any issue. And trying to push people towards the most extreme positions is likely to polarize the group more, rather than leading to compromise.
That point is well made. It gives me pause. I'm thinking it over. [...]
I'd like to hear what our other chair thinks about this idiosyncratic interpretation of the W3C decision process.
Yes, here's hoping you find time to think about this and respond, Chris. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
