On Jul 5, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:34:43 +0200, Robert Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
So far I haven't seen much activity in the getting user agents
more interopable area. Most of it is people requesting a <burger/
> element to be included in the next version of HTML. And
complaints about some explicit accessibility features from HTML 4
that are not included in the current draft because several use
cases were not considered and not much research was done in the
area.
I can't imagine how our WG can't be about interoperability.
Me neither.
As for <burger/> element, the closest thing we have to a <burger/>
element are the <video>, <audio>, and <canvas> elements.
These are not requested, these are being implemented. The
specification is there to make sure they are implemented in an
interoperable way. They help making HTML a more viable open
alternative to Flash, Flex, Silverlight, etc.
No... they don't.
