Hi Dan and Chris,
Sorry for the confusion. I didn't realize you meant all process: as
in even a motion like this. I thought you were more referring to
"process" as in the delicate interpersonal matters that my last
"process" email may have caused. Anyway, no harm, no foul.
This proposal was very poorly received, so I'm convinced it needs no
further airing. I am a little concerned how process issues that
should be dealt with on the list can be handled, off-list, but I'm
sure we'll get the details ironed out.
Take care,
Rob
original message
----------------------
On Aug 20, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 07:12 -0500, Rob Burns wrote:
Hello All WG Members,
Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads
This is clearly process discussion. Perhaps I was too
subtle when I asked 17 Aug 2007 that...
[[
In order to keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] focussed on the technical
work of this group, I encourage everyone to take process
issues up directly with the involved people and/or the chairs.
]]
-- http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have a process suggestion, please run it by the chairs
(and perhaps a few early reviewers) before sending it to
public-html.
Follow-ups to this thread to the chairs, please, with
copy to [email protected] unless it's sensitive.
