Dan Connolly wrote: > Joshue O Connor, your comment under "do you support > publication" doesn't seem to correspond to the "Strongly > Disagree" answer you gave above. You > say "An explicit commitment to accessibility needs to be included." > but you don't refer to any text that would address your concern. > If at all possible, please do.
I agree with Steve when he suggested that accessibility be an explicit part of the Universal Access principle [1]. Thats what I was thinking of when I included it in the "Do you support publication" question. I gave two "Strongly Disagrees" to both the 'Avoid Needless Complexity" and "Secure by Design" principles as I think they are useless and should ideally be dropped. I thought I was pretty clear in my comments. Let me know if you need any more info. Josh [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0663.html
