On 2007-08-25 01:58:07 +0200 Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2007, at 4:30 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >> 2007-08-24 21:11:36 +0200 Maciej Stachowiak: >> >>> Can we end this silliness now? You have spent more time complaining about >>> people expressing their opinions in outside forums than in actually >>> providing research or close review that would help improve the spec. I >>> have >>> tried to give you the benefit of the doubt but it is starting to seem >>> like >>> your only goal here is to create conflict. >> >> >> «Free speech» does not mean «Freedom to speak on behalf». The latter >> is a «right» one naturally should have the sense to «sacrifice» in a >> consensus driven work group. > > You consider it speaking on the group's behalf to say what I personally > think is *likely* to happen with the spec in a bug tracker for my own > project? Just because I happen to be a member of the group? If so, then it > is impossible for me to both be a member of this Working Group and do my > job. I hope the chairs think otherwise. Please note that I have *not* asked the chairs to have any opinion about your bug tracker. The wording «people expressing their opinions in outside forums» is the relevant phrase to which my comment related. By «people» I suppose you did not only have yourself in mind. And by «forums» you probably did not only think about your bug tracker. But in order to relate Maciej's subject to my subject: the praxis of feature removal as soon as someone has expressed the «opinion» that «HTML5 has dropped the feature», does not to amount consenus building in my book. -- leif halvard silli
