-public-html
+www-archive
Scott,
Robert Burns (3 oct. 2007 - 12:56) :
My point was that nothing in those documents tells us about the big
picture regarding the intent of those major vendors with respect to
XHTML2 or HTML5 (other than that they made intellectual property
available to this WG as do we all). So I would still say that we
members of the HTML WG (humble or otherwise) could not possibly
know the intent of the browser vendors regarding XHTML2 support".
Certainly the citations you provided change nothing about that.
Robert is right. These documents say nothing about the intents.
And even when a vendor is making a statement, it can change its
position later on depending on marketing and market constraints.
It has already happened in the past.
http://www.bestkungfu.com/archive/date/2004/07/on-implementing-svg/
http://www.xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1865
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
