At 8:27 AM -0600 14 12 2007, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
Hello,
I have forwarded your question to my WAI colleagues; I am no
longer actively involved in the project.
Gokhan,
Please look over:
Understanding levels of conformance:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20071211/conformance.html#uc-levels-head
.. as linked from
WCAG20 Layers of Guidance
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#intro-layers-guidance
.. and
Conformance Evaluation of Web Sites for Accessibility
http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/conformance.html
Hope this helps.
Al
Thank you,
_ Ian
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 10:28 +0200, Gokhan Arzi wrote:
Dear W3C,
We have a few questions regarding W3C accessibility.
- Do you separate the rules like essentials and optionals?
- Can we say that we are Accesibility compatible, if
validators do not generate errors?
- In order to have an "accessible" content and clean codes,
should all errors and warnings be fixed?
These questions are really crucial for us.
Hope to hear from you soon.
Best regards.
Gökhan ARZI
Web Developer
nexum creative
Head Office: Maslak Meydan Sok.Spring Giz Plaza
Kat: 14 80670 Maslak / Istanbul
Tel : + 90 212 328 19 29
Fax: + 90 212 328 19 33
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.nexumcreative.com
--
Ian Jacobs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:signature 510.asc ( / ) (0019FC27)
