Steven Faulkner wrote:
[...]
>As I said, this looks like a design issue; there is somewhere
>around 2 years of back-log on those in front of the PFWG request.
It seems somewhat incongruous that a decision to change something can be
made at the editors whim, but there is a 2 year back log to
even begin reversing the change.
Yes, it's pretty unfortunate.
We're working on changing that situation, but that's where we are.
To re-iterate:
If the pace isn't satisfactory to you, you're welcome to
(a) come to a teleconference and argue for higher priority
(b) ask Al Gilman to follow up
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
