Because Micrsoft already created a PDF version, right? (I don't have acess to the list archive ATM to confirm.)
-----Original Message----- From: ext Chris Wilson Sent: 2008-06-13 1:20:03 pm To: ext Chris Wilson;Michael(tm) Smith Cc: Barstow Art (Nokia-OCTO/Boston);Sunava Dutta;Michael Champion;Rigo Wenning;Charles McCathieNevile;Doug Schepers;[email protected] Subject: RE: URGENT: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS] Neither of those were points I was contending. I expected it to get posted directly to the list; sorry it didn't. Dunno what the click-thru license was about. Sunava owns fixing. I asked specifically why a PROPRIETARY format copy of the document was being requested (by Art). I'd expect HTML, personally, not plaintext; I don't quite understand why we can't at least agree on HTML4.01 as a basic document interchange format. > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael(tm) Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 10:01 AM > To: Chris Wilson > Cc: Arthur Barstow; Sunava Dutta; Michael Champion; Rigo Wenning; > Charles McCathieNevile; Doug Schepers; [email protected] > Subject: Re: URGENT: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier > feedback from MS] > > Chris, > > To put it very simply what we have all have preferred from the > beginning is for the comments to be posted *directly to the list* > in PLAIN TEXT the way we have handled the rest of the > communication around this. > > Is there some reason you guys can't manage to find a way to do that? > > --Mike > > Chris Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008-06-13 09:56 -0700: > > > Out of curiousity, why would you want a proprietary-format copy of > the paper? > > > > From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:58 AM > > To: Sunava Dutta; Michael Champion; Chris Wilson > > Cc: Rigo Wenning; Charles McCathieNevile; Doug Schepers; Mike Smith; > [email protected] > > Subject: URGENT: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier > feedback from MS] > > Importance: High > > > > All - please address this request ASAP i.e. today. > > > > This input is already overdue by one week and the f2f meeting is only > two weeks away. > > > > -Regards, Art Barstow > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > > > From: "ext Rigo Wenning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > Date: June 12, 2008 5:06:01 PM EDT > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > Cc: "Barstow Art (Nokia-OCTO/Boston)" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>, > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>, > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > Subject: Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback > from MS] > > > > Dear all, > > > > I've looked at the click-through license of the Microsoft Public > > License. The license has some viral effects and if the specification > > you are producing here will re-use parts of Microsoft's document, we > > may end up in a situation where the Recommendation would also have to > > carry the MS-Public license because of the click-through. > > > > I would rather like to avoid such a confusing situation. So if this > > document is not only for reading, I would kindly ask Microsoft to > > provide the document either in member space or in public space as a > > contribution within the framework of the work of this group. This > > would allow all to work in the context they expect. The contribution > > can be done by sending the document to the mailing-list or adding it > > to the wiki with a comment that it is designated to be input and > > contribution to the WebAPI work. > > > > Would that be feasible? I think that was what Art requested in the > > message cited below. > > > > Best, > > > > Rigo Wenning > > W3C Staff counsel > > > > Art Barstow wrote: > > Sunava - as requested by several members of the WG, please send a > > PDF > > version of this document directly to the public-webapps mail list. > > > > -Thanks, Art Barstow > > > > > > -- > Michael(tm) Smith > http://people.w3.org/mike/ > http://sideshowbarker.net/
