moved chris to bcc: (to remove him from the recipient's list) and added
boris, since he was very active in the discussion.
A mailinglist would indeed make life easier.
Axel
Sandro Hawke wrote:
All,
I don't think there is a need to continue cc'ing the comments lists
for all the WGs on this thread.
I'd like to consider this a task force of RIF, OWL, and I guess I18N, let you
guys do the work and then report back to the WGs.
OK?
Ooops, yeah. I've added www-archive to the cc list, so the e-mail is
properly archived *somewhere*, at least.
Shall I request a new mailing list for this? [EMAIL PROTECTED], I
guess?
One odd thing that occured to me (during my sleep, I think) about using
the RDF namespace is that the rdf:text datatype will never be used in
(existing) RDF serializations, because they already have a way to
serialize such data. Happily, this lets us avoid worrying about the
constraint in RDF Syntax [1], "Any other names [in the RDF namespace]
are not defined and SHOULD generate a warning when encountered". We
should note this in the spec, I think. Note also that future RDF
serializations might choose to use this, so they don't have to
special-case language-tagged strings.
-- Sandro
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/#section-Namespace
--
Dr. Axel Polleres, Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url: http://www.polleres.net/
Everything is possible:
rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:Resource.
rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subPropertyOf.
rdf:type rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subClassOf.
rdfs:subClassOf rdf:type owl:SymmetricProperty.
