On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:48:11 +0200, Steven Faulkner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It took me by surprise that a whatwg IRC regular such as yourself was
citing the charter, the statement was a general remark, not intended
to necessarily imply that you personally have disdain for the html WG
charter, but as a comment on the usally derisive remarks and comments
of your peers that litter the IRC when W3C HTML WG process or the W3C
in general is cited as a reason to take a particular action.
I guess we believe more in argument and evidence than process. (Which
often feels like appeal to authority.)
If you took it as a personal slight, that was not intended.
Then please be a little bit more careful with your words next time as
"you" and "in this case" certainly made it sound like it was about me.
2008/8/29 Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I would like an explanation for "btw It is good to see you recognising
the HTML WG charter in this case." as I've no idea when I tried
avoiding the
HTML charter and I would like to know.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
