On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:52:12 +0100, Dean Edridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have nothing at all against Mike being "pro-active" and putting some thing together and publishing it, it's only the fact that it's been published at, and endorsed by the W3C that bothers me, it's pretty hard to argue against such a spec when it has already been published and people have accepted that it's here for good. I explained this in detail but I don't think you listen.
In what way has it been published and endorsed by the W3C? It certainly does not look to be published and endorsed more than say when I first drafted the html5-diff document, on which the HTML WG had not made any decisions at that time either.
(I'm not sure I agree with that the document should define things in a normative way, but I have a hard time seeing how anything Mike did here is wrong.)
-- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
