On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 25, 2008, at 21:12, Mark Baker wrote: > >> Defining the language in terms of an abstraction which isn't relevant to >> all uses of HTML is IMO, >> prima facie a bad idea. > > Would you accept an abstraction of "document tree"?
I'd accept any solution that could be understood by a layperson. Mark.
