Hi Tim,
I am a Chair of the W3C's Web Applications WG [WebApps] and in the
context of our Widgets spec [Widgets], particularly Requirements #6
[Req-6] and #37 [Reg-37], we are interested in the tag: scheme.
Marcos Caceres, the Editor of our Widgets spec, asked me to contact
to you re this scheme. For a bit of context, please see his email
below as well as a summary of the Widget scheme issue in [Widget-
scheme].
If you have any info to share, we would greatly appreciate it.
Here is one the latest discussion threads we've had on this scheme:
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/
0299.html>
-Regards, Art Barstow
[WebApps] <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Main_Page>
[Widgets] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/>
[Req-6] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/#r6.-addressing>
[Req-37] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/#r37.->
[Widget-scheme] <http://tinyurl.com/69yegh>
Begin forwarded message:
From: "ext Marcos Caceres" <[email protected]>
Date: December 6, 2008 11:56:24 AM EST
To: "Arthur Barstow" <[email protected]>
Subject: tag: uri scheme
Hi Art,
I'm wondering if you could do me a huge favor. In light of the tag:
uri scheme potentially meeting our needs in regards to a widget uri,
I was wondering if you could take the time to contact Tim Kindberg
([email protected]), who created the tag: scheme, and possibly ask
him to weight in on the discussion on the packaging list, web apps
list, and the TAG list. It would be great if you could point him to
our requirements R6 and R37 and maybe some of the relevant emails. It
would also be a big help if you could also ask him if he managed to
resolve i18n issues with tag:; And if no, what would need to be done.
Kind regards,
Marcos
--
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
