On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 14:23 +1300, Dean Edridge wrote: > What you keep referring to is a larger problem that has indeed caused > the problem that I drew your attention to, but the point here is that > the problem with the note can be easily solved without charter changes, > or huge discussions, and without even changing the contents of the note. > The contradiction/conflict/confusion can simply be solved by someone > doing the two things that I requested, and that is, changing the title > and URL of the note so it's clear that it only applies to XHTML 1.x. :-) > The fact that the W3C process allows the XHTML2 WG to "not be obligated" > to make the requested changes doesn't mean that the note shouldn't or > can't be changed. ;-)
Agreed. But it does mean that, unless you convince the XHTML2 Working Group to make the change, the change won't happen. Philippe
