Rob Sayre wrote:
It
attempts to put an immediate spec-writing and working-group benefit
(namely, being able to move forward without objections) ahead of the
user.
This, IMHO, is unacceptable (and is counter to our design principles).
I don't think this kind of argument is productive. Using it, someone
claiming to represent users could challenge any edit to the document. In
other words, it's "wrapping yourself in the flag".
This is precisely why I prefer to talk in terms of specific proposals.
- Sam Ruby
