On 25 Feb 2009, at 13:55, Sam Ruby wrote:
[snip]
I personally don't want to relive sXBL, either directly by reliving
the experience or vicariously by participating in a postmortem. I
merely want to find the right balance for this working group.
Of list, Sam has suggested that my not ccing him indicated that I was
trying to cut him out of the conversation (after having interjected
myself into the conversation). This seems in response to:
"""> I personally don't want to relive sXBL, either directly by reliving
> the experience or vicariously by participating in a postmortem. I
> merely want to find the right balance for this working group.
Sure. I'm sorry, did I cc you? If so, I didn't mean to. Per usual in
these debates, I am merely trying to ensure that things which I can
easily check get checked. """
I misread what he was saying as an indication that he found the
postmortem something he didn't want to participate in and that I was
pulling him in. My reply was based on the thought that I had cced him
and that he didn't care for that. That's all. I'm happy to discuss
the idea of how to process lessons learned with him, or with anyone.
And I certainly don't think that replying to email on www-archive is
out of bounds for anyone.
Cheers,
Bijan.
