On 21/5/09 11:41, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 15:53:39 +0200, Doug Schepers<[email protected]> wrote:
FYI, typically moving a thread to www-archive gets many more people
reading it. A post to www-archive is essentially a call for wider
review. The public-html ML is so overwhelming that many people only
read what leaks over into www-archive.
It's fine if you intended your post to do that; I just wanted to clarify
that it does not decrease the number of people you are "bothering".
Doug, that's a crock :) Anyone fool enough to actually subscribe to
www-archive gets exactly what they signed up for : anything. It just so
happens that www-archive generally has more interesting content than
most other W3C lists, so the gossip-hungry procrastinators amongst us
enjoy the list. It's my favourite.
Yours, a loyal www-archive reader who gets what he deserves,
Dan
How do you measure this?
Subscriber numbers do not really back this up:
http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/MailingListQuery.pl?queryList=www-archive (W3C
Member-only)
http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/MailingListQuery.pl?queryList=public-html (W3C
Member-only)
