Ian Hickson wrote: > > > Evidence has been presented that actually not only does summary="" not > actually in practice serve the need for which it is intended well, but > that it causes extra harm to users, >
Could you kindly share with us this evidence, please? (JF asks politely) > > So the data I have seen on the matter suggests that users in fact do not > find the summary="" attribute to be useful. > Could you kindly share with us this data, please? (JF again asks politely) > > Actually the research I have seen suggests quite the opposite -- > Could you kindly share with us this research, please? (JF once more asks politely) > > I believe that restoring the summary="" attribute to the HTML5 language > would negatively impact users, which is a greater concern to me than any > possible impact to the specification itself. > While your personal belief is duly noted in the discussion (along with an appreciation of your concerns), the consensus reached by Protocols and Formats Working Group [an identified W3C experts group] on June 3, 2009 does not concur. Perhaps the evidence, data and research you mention (if provided) might serve to suggest they re-evaluate their deliberations and conclusion? Otherwise, I like many, look forward to your cooperation in ensuring that the draft specification re-instates the @summary attribute as requested by PF-WG, given that "The HTML Working Group will cooperate with the Web Accessibility Initiative to ensure that the deliverables will satisfy accessibility requirements." [http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html]. Sincerely, JF
