I looked and it isn't April 1st. I think the question of whether the normative requirements in the document are appropriate for any role other than those of the "four major browsers" (or, more likely, really 'webkit and mozilla chasing IE with Opera chasing') is legitimate, and turning it into a joke deflects legitimate discussion.
I'd expect more from a "W3C Team Contact". Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Bug 7034] New: change "conformance checker" to "ideology checker" or "loyalty checker" http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7034 Summary: change "conformance checker" to "ideology checker" or "loyalty checker" Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- html/2009Jun/0519.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Spec proposals AssignedTo: [email protected] ReportedBy: [email protected] QAContact: [email protected] CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Please change all instances of the phrase "conformance checker" in the spec to either "ideology checker" or "loyalty checker". -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
