Henri Sivonen wrote: >> <table summary="Child investment portfolios with budgeted, actual and >> forecast running costs for particular dates"> > > > It's much shorter, and it's caption-like.
Agreed, so it could be improved. Assessing this issue is qualitative, it is also subjective. There is no absolute ruling as to what is, or isn't /correct/. What is important is that the mechanism exists in the first place and in the final analysis it is the authors discretion that needs to be exercised. > I think this anecdotal case study supports the notion that @summary > isn't actually used as prescribed--not even by experts. You could take that view, but it doesn't progress the argument. The point is moot. Cheers Josh
