Ian Hickson wrote:
...In this case, "we" excludes me. When I say that, I do *not* refer to a particular bag of bits.I think you misread what I wrote, or objected to the wrong part of what I wrote, because your objection here doesn't make sense (you're denying what I said and then saying exactly what I said)....
Ah, oh. I misread what you said, because I assumed you were sticking to "a resource is a bag of bits", something you said before either on IRC or public-html.
Sorry.
