Hi, Folks-
Sam Ruby wrote (on 2/14/10 4:05 PM):
Shelley Powers wrote:
I no longer know how to participate in the group. I cannot participate
in the group if the co-chairs continue in their uneven stewardship of
the group.
So, for now, I would like to reserve public-html for discussions of the
form of "hey Charles (or Ian): can you update your change proposal to
include 'x'" or "hey Chairs: I'm not happy with either change proposal,
and I would like to produce a third one, can I have n days in order to
prepare it?"
Other discussions can (and should) proceed. Just elsewhere, with results
brought back to the larger group.
As a subscriber to www-archive, and as someone interested in allowing
people their say in the HTML process (even if they don't want to join
the WG to do so), isn't there a list that would be more appropriate to
such discussions? Shelley and Tab want to debate something about
HTML... that seems in scope for *some* HTML WG list, if not public-html.
Why not use public-html-comments rather than www-archive? That seems
more respectful to people participating in the HTML WG discussions, and
to people who would rather not have HTML WG-specific arguments spill
over into www-archive.
Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
