On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 16:15 -0500, Manu Sporny wrote: > When we were publishing HTML+RDFa as a FPWD, and then again in the most > recent draft, it was repeated several times that (paraphrasing): "Just > because the HTML WG is publishing HTML+RDFa now does not mean that we > intend to commit to publishing it as a REC".
Unless I'm mistaken, it remains true. And this is also true for the main HTML5 specification as well. > Has HTML WG, with the recent charter update, committed to HTML+RDFa as a > WG deliverable? This text seems to imply that it has: > > http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html#deliverables Correct. I wanted to list the existence documents being worked on in the Working Group. > Can I start telling people that RDFa is planned to be released as a part > of HTML5? Yes, as it is true as well for Canvas and Microdata. It is not part of the HTML5 specification itself, but it is part of the HTML5 extensions. Philippe
