On 06.10.2010 15:53, Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
Hi Noah,
Per the new process documented in in draft-nottingham-http-link-header /
RFC 5988, I recently sent a message[1] to the [email protected]
mailing list requesting registration of the relation name "up":
[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations/current/msg00062.html
In a reply[1], Mark Nottingham (in his role as the Designated Expert for
the link-relations registry) indicated that I should coordinate with you
about registration for the "up" relation name, since you are the person who
originally registered the "up" relation.
[2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations/current/msg00080.html
So, if you could please review the text at the end of this message and let
Mark and I know if it looks OK, I'd appreciate it.
If it's not OK as-is, the preferred means for requesting a change would be
for you to file a bug in the HTML WG bugzilla database:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG&component=HTML5%20spec%20(editor:%20Ian%20Hickson)&priority=P3
http://w3.org/brief/MjA2
Here are the registration details I've proposed:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Relation Name:
up
Description:
Provides a link to a document giving the context for the current
document.
Reference:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-up
Notes:
Template to be added to W3C HTML5 specification before
publication of next Working Draft
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Note, in <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-up>:
"The up keyword may be repeated within a rel attribute to indicate the
hierarchical distance from the current document to the referenced
document. If it occurs only once, then the link is leading to the
current document's parent; each additional occurrence of the keyword
represents one further level."
Related WG issue: <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/119>.
Best regards, Julian
