Le 15 févr. 2011 à 18:39, Ian Hickson a écrit : > So what you're really describing is a situation where we have two living > standards, one with new features and one with only features that are > widely implemented? I guess that could make sense; having one for people > who only want to use features that are widely implemented, and one for > people who are implementing the features or on the bleeding edge.
It could be nice to have things which are smaller. Not only big document with everything, but just small snapshots of what is "widely implemented" (still to be defined) > The W3C does not provide this (and to my knowledge, has no plans to -- in > fact the W3C process doesn't have a mechanism in place for this kind of thing > currently). This can change. -- Karl Dubost Montréal, QC, Canada http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
