On 14 April 2011 22:20, Ian Hickson <[email protected]> wrote: > For developer-facing non-normative documentation, the WHATWG is likely to > continue using the term "HTML5" for some time, but it really has nothing > to do with the W3C draft.
I'm curious, and so hope you will answer a direct question - who gains what from maintaining confusion through contradictory/ambiguous naming? Cheers, Danny. -- http://danny.ayers.name
