On 2011-11-11 17:01, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:47:25 +0100, Steve Faulkner
<faulkner.st...@gmail.com> wrote:
The editor had more than a reasonable amount of time to get to the
revert request, he found time to respond to other bugs and publicly
respond to the working group decision to make the revert against his
wishes.
Replying to a bug and answering some questions does not mean Ian had
access to the source document where the edit needs to be made. And even
if he did, the steps taken now are way more harmful than waiting a
little longer.
And they continue to be harmful, as we now effectively have a fork, with
Mike having to maintain it.
Lots of time was wasted already; future waste of time could be avoided
by Ian actually applying the revert to his version of the spec.
What exactly stops him from doing that? Please remind me.
Best regards, Julian
