On 1/25/2012 8:04 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
For what it's worth, I did not interpret Ian's original remark as saying he didn't follow W3C process; though I can see how someone may have parsed it in that fashion.

Thanks for the clarification.


In the original thread, nobody was claiming or denying following accepted W3C process. Rather, I was suggesting that certain clauses in the process document be referenced in a proposed warning to add to the DOM2 spec(s). I continue to feel that approach is warranted and consistent with similar statements of status found elsewhere in W3C specs.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch <mailto:i...@hixie.ch>> wrote:

    On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
    >
    > 2. Nonetheless, for situations that he is wearing his hat as
    Editor within a
    > W3C Working Group, he agrees to follow the W3C Process.

    My original statement was: "Nobody really follows the W3C process.
    Some
    claim to, others (such as myself) do not."

    To be more explicit: Nobody always follows the W3C process. Some
    claim to,
    others do not claim to. I do not claim to. Those who claim to tend to
    bring up the process when it helps their political needs, and
    ignore it
    when that is more convenient. Those who do not claim to tend to
    argue for
    their cases on technical merit instead. Bjoern has in the past written
    long missives documenting the many ways that people who claim to
    follow
    the process blithely ignore it when it's convenient.

    That isn't to say that everything I do violates the W3C process.
    On the
    contrary, sometimes I follow it more closely than W3C staff (e.g. the
    process requires chaters to describe the milestones for
    deliverables; W3C
    staff usually instead write woefully optimistic fiction even when
    I have
    provided them with realistic predictions).

    I do not agree to follow the W3C process blindly.

    I follow it, like everyone else, exactly to the extent that I think it
    requires us to do the right thing for the Web. When the process
    requires
    us to do something bad for the Web, I ignore it.

    (This is why, for example, I do not participate in the work
    required to
    make copies of the specs I work on for the TR/ page.)


Reply via email to