(Cc -www-style +www-archive to avoid spamming the list with unimportant thingy.)
(12/04/24 4:07), Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > Heya Kenny! > > Below are our responses to the issues you raised in this thread. > > Issue 13: cycle() can't skip levels, or easily refer to non-inherited > properties > Issue 14: Example UA stylesheet using cycle() for <ul> is incorrect. > Issue 15: Value equality of components of cycle() ill-defined > Closed as OutOfScope pending WG resolution - we proposed punting > cycle() to level 4 so we can address these and other issues with the > design of the spec properly. > > Please let us know if these are acceptable! This is fine by me, but I think you should also ask for dbaron's opinion on this. Cheers, Kenny
