On 07/17/2012 01:10 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
In general, if I strongly disagree with something, I'll just followup in
the list (say, spaces around '+' and '-'), so yes, I think the editors
handled my comments adequately.
Thanks. I know you've mentioned this before, but for LC we need to put
a recorded response, to make sure things don't fall through the cracks.
Just some extra input here:
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0629.html
This is followed up in [1]. Apparently I don't think it's too important
so I took it off the list. I am not going to debate more about editorial
issues.
Ok
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0381.html
I don't have time to think more about this one but for the purpose of
the process, I don't have a problem with your response.
Ok
Oh, one nitty thing, may I ask the editors to use "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu"
or "Kang-Hao Lu" as my name on the DoCs. I just never go by "Kenny Lu".
"Kenny" is just my nick and "Lu" is part of my formal name so it pretty
weird to see this combination (to me). Also, there are too many "Kenny
Lu" out there.
I told Tab about this before[2] but that wasn't carried out (perhaps it
was reverted?).
No clue what happened. It's all checked in now (retroactively for css3-images
as well):
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/issues-lc-2012
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-values/issues-lc-2012
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/issues-lc-2012
Thanks for all the hard working:)
Thanks for the detailed reviews! Even the editorial comments: they're
very frustrating to deal with as an editor, because it's so much fiddly
word-smithing stuff, but they make the spec better in the end. :)
Though in the future... if you can separate out substantive issues
from the editorial ones into separate threads, it would help us with
tracking. ^^ (If the spec's unclear, and multiple reasonable
interpretations of the spec's intent are possible, it's probably a
substantive issue.)
~fantasai
