Ok, this is my mistake:
Below is the message I've received from public-html-ad...@w3.org, list
in which I had not registered.
I had not noticed that my mail was sent to both public-html-ad...@w3.org
and public-html-me...@w3.org
I apology for this.
Do you want I post a message to explain that it was my fault, in order
to clear everybody mind regarding non fair-play action I've suggested ?
With lind regards,
Gaël,
*** NOTE: ***
Your message was sent from an address which is not on the list
of people who are authorized to post to this mailing list.
Therefore, your message has been forwarded to the list maintainer
for manual processing.
If you do not see your message appear on the list or in the
mailing list archives within a few business days, you may wish
to contact the mailing list maintainer to investigate the delay.
-- W3C Postmaster
http://www.w3.org/Mail/
your message follows:
-------------------------------------------
Le 30/05/2013 16:02, Paul Cotton a écrit :
I've just been removed from this list.
Since the original message was copied to both public-html-ad...@w3.org and
public-html-me...@w3.org it would help for Gael to tell what list he thinks he
was removed from?
With that data, could Robin or Mike look into this?
/paulc
PS: Gael: Mike works in Japan and Robin is in Europe so please be patient if a
time zone difference delays their response.
Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
-----Original Message-----
From: Gaël Pegliasco [mailto:g...@pegliasco.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:54 AM
To: Ronane
Cc: Florian Bösch; Andreas Kuckartz; Sam Ruby; ti...@w3.org;
public-html-ad...@w3.org; <public-html-me...@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted
Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)
I've just been removed from this list.
I hope this is "accidental" as it would not be very fair-play to automatically
unsubscribe people writing objections to EME...
Best regards,
GaËl,
Le 30/05/2013 15:40, Gaël Pegliasco a écrit :
Le 30/05/2013 11:12, Ronane a écrit :
I agree as well.
I think that w3c has for now legitimation to develop the standards of
web but it would lose it if it try to add EME into the web.
I agree with that point.
This legitimation is acquired because we all agree with W3C Open
Standard and accept to follow these rules defined in the most open way.
But like any other open source project, W3C can be forked if it choose
to go on closed way.
Regards,
Gaël,
