On Jul 15, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Sandro Hawke <san...@w3.org> wrote: > Equality is another perfectly good way to distinguish them (we don't need > time). agreed - and interesting. I suspect that what you call DirectDataset may be incoherent …. I will have a think My previously linked 2004 ref-logic e-mail shows that "(and they tell me the also want other things, like entailments within the named graphs, although I'm not convinced that's worth it.)" is rather mild - that simply doesn't work. Jeremy
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/... Sandro Hawke
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.or... Jeremy J Carroll
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.or... Jeremy J Carroll
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w... Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w... Sandro Hawke
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://w... Jeremy J Carroll
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http... Sandro Hawke
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w... Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://w... Sandro Hawke
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.or... Sandro Hawke
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w... Jeremy J Carroll
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://w... Sandro Hawke