Hi Peter,
The wording of this definition looks good to me, but why are you opposed
to moving it to the RDF Semantics document? AFAICT, the term is not
used in the RDF Concepts document, but it *is* used in the RDF Semantcs
document. Also, moving it to RDF Semantics would give it less
visibility, which (to my mind) would be appropriate given that standard
RDF is what the W3C is intending to promote, rather than generalized RDF.
David
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF"
Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:11:52 +0000
Resent-From: public-rdf-comme...@w3.org
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:11:18 -0400
From: David Wood <da...@3roundstones.com>
To: David Booth <da...@dbooth.org>
CC: RDF Comments <public-rdf-comme...@w3.org>
Hi David,
This is an official response from the RDF Working Group regarding your
comment at [1] on the definition of "Generalized RDF". Your comment is
being tracked at our ISSUE-147 [2].
The WG discussed your concerns at our 2 Oct telecon [3] and via email
[4]. Those discussions resulted in a decision to leave the definition
of "generalized RDF" in RDF 1.1 Concepts, but to change the definition
to the following:
[[
Generalized RDF triples, graphs, and datasets differ from normative RDF
triples, graphs, and datasets only by allowing IRIs, blank
nodes and literals to appear anywhere as subject, predicate, object or
graph name.
]]
My action to make the editorial changes was tracked at [5].
The updated section 7 is available in the current editors' draft [6].
Please advise the working group whether this change is acceptable to you
by responding to this message. Thank you for your participation.
Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood
[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Oct/0006.html
[2] ISSUE-147: https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/147
[3] https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-10-09#line0228
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Oct/0030.html
[5] ACTION-309: https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/309
[6]
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-generalized-rdf
