>V1Editorial I agree that it might be useful for the Editors to prioritize the V1Nonblocking issues AFTER all the V1 work is done. But maybe we should consider adding a separate Editorial tag?
Sent from my Windows 10 phone From: Mark Watson<mailto:wats...@netflix.com> Sent: May 13, 2016 8:06 AM To: Paul Cotton<mailto:paul.cot...@microsoft.com>; Jerry Smith (IEP)<mailto:jdsm...@microsoft.com>; David Dorwin<mailto:ddor...@google.com>; www-archive@w3.org<mailto:www-archive@w3.org>; Matt Wolenetz<mailto:wolen...@google.com>; Philippe Le Hégaret<mailto:p...@w3.org> Subject: Re: Separate milestone for editorial issues ? I should have addressed this only to editors / chairs. In addition, it might be useful to have a "Final Review" label. We would replace "needs implementation" with this label when there is a Pull Request available for the issue. Thoughts ? ...Mark On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Mark Watson <wats...@netflix.com<mailto:wats...@netflix.com>> wrote: We have V1NonBlocking issues, some of which are substantial but only nice-to-have and some of which are purely editorial. I wonder if we should disambiguate them ? V1Editorial ? I assume we can address such purely editorial issues after June 9th. ...Mark
