Hi, This is a QA Review comment for "XHTML 2.0" http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/ 2006-07-26 8th WD
About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/mod-meta.html XHTML 2.0 Specification gives an example which might lead to interoperability problems. "<meta property="dc:identifier"> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3236.txt </meta>" Specifying an URI in a CDATA section might create troubles as the specification doesn't define a normalization of the content. All of these following syntaxes are possible values extracted from the example above. There are more possibilities. - " http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3236.txt"; - "http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3236.txt " - "http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3236.txt"; - " http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3236.txt " This example is not a good practice and should not be showed or at least said that it's a bad practice leading to problems. The note should be warning. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
