--- David Latapie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 25 sept. 06 à 15:00, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
>
> > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:54:30 +0200, David Latapie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> -- <em role="0"> default
> >> -- <em role="+1"> equivalent to em
> >> -- <em role="+2"> equivalent to strong
> >> -- <em role="-1"> less important, may be rendered as font-size:smaller
> >
> > This proposal doesn't cover nesting.
>
> Do you mean emphasis inside an emphasis? I suggest *addition*
That seems like it may be a bit complicated for browsers to implement. Why not
just let the values
speak for themselves.
<em role="+1">This is some what emphasized. <em role="-2">This is fairly
strongly de-emphasized<em
role="+2">This is fairly strongly emphasized</em> Back to fairly strongly
de-emphasized</em> Back
to some what emphasized.</em>
Granted this would not nor should not be considered good practice, but i think
that's how nesting
should be handled
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
