On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:37:04 +0200, Steven Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anne, we agree with you in principle, though as you have seen not everyone does.
Well, that was more about what it would mean for it to be "a URI" I think. Whether it would mean supporting external maps or not. I think it should be a same-document reference, but the syntax should be a URI for consistency.
However, the aim of this revision is to add schema support, and not to change the markup languages using Modularization. If we made this change, languages that already use this modularization would become invalid.
Which is exactly what I want. XHTML 1.1 is creating bug reports in web browsers on image maps exactly because of mistakes like this.
Therefore we will postpone adopting this change until we update the languages using modularization.
I disagree with this descision. I think it's about time that this change is reverted.
-- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
