Well - I can't speak for that document, but XHTML Modules cannot be
subsetted - so you have to take everything in it or nothing. Since they
chose to use XHTML Basic Forms, they can only use the elements therein.
They could not have chosen a subset of the items in XHTML Forms.
Vicente Luque Centeno wrote:
Thanks.
However, why don't the fieldset and legend elements make sense in
XHTML Print?
Best regards.
Vicente Luque Centeno
Dep. Ingeniería Telemática
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
http://www.it.uc3m.es/vlc
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Shane McCarron wrote:
Basic forms was designed to provide a simple subset of forms -
something readily supportable on devices with limited processing and
display capabilities. Those elements - in particular optgroup - did
not call into that collection. Vicente Luque Centeno wrote:
In XHTML Print 1.0, elements like fieldset, legend and optgroup are
not allowed. Steven kindly told me that XHTML Print 1.0 uses the Basic
Forms module from XHTML Modularization (which does not recognize such
elements). Can someone explain why these elements were rejected from
the Basic Forms module from XHTML Modularization? Wouldn't it be
wiser to have fieldset, legend and optgroup allowed in the Basic
Forms module?
Thanks.
Vicente Luque Centeno
Dep. Ingeniería Telemática
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
http://www.it.uc3m.es/vlc
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota Inet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota Inet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
